The evaluation of the reptilian species of Colombia shower that 50 % of crocodilian and 37 % of turtle species are theatened and there is not enough information to categorize 20 % of all reptile species. It therefore necessary to strengthen conservation and management efforts for threatened species, as well as develop more research concerning those that lack information.


Read text ▼

Colombia is the fourth country in the world with greatest reptile species richness, after Australia, Mexico, and Brazil. Historically, reptiles have suffered great anthropic pressures since some species are captured for consumption, held as pets, and seeked for the use of their skin. In other cases, reptiles are also sacrificed because people fear them. To all of these threats are also added the loss, transformation, and degradation of their habitat, which especially affects those species in the Caribbean slopes and the basin of the Magdalena-Cauca Rivers because 80 % of the human population, and thus th the economical development of the country, is located there. In 2002, the first extinction risk evaluation for reptiles was developed. In that time, crocodilians and turtles were mostly evaluated since for snakes and lizards there was still no complete species list for Colombia. According to the guidelines of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), these evaluations must take place every eight years; however, the second evaluation for the extinction risk of reptiles in Colombia was only completed after thirteen years, in 2015.

Of the 510 species and 2 subspecies that wereevaluated, 9 % (43 species and one subspecies) werecategorized under a threat category: 2 % (11 species) areCritically Endangered, 3 % (16 species) are Endangered,and 3 % (17 species) are Vulnerable. It is also worrisometo know that 20 % of reptiles in Colombia do not haveinformation of any kind, eluding proper evaluation. These species are categorized as Data Deficient (DD)1.

The groups with the greatest number of threatenedspecies are turtles and lizards. However, the most affectedgroups (percentage of threatened species over totalspecies in the group) are crocodilians (50 % of species threatened), followed by turtles 37 %1.

Based on the information analyzed, it may beconcluded that it is essential to start generating standardized population data, as well as evaluating and quantifying the threats that affect different species.These aspects are the most relevant while applying IUCN criteria. It is therefore recommended to prioritize species with greatest threat status and those categorized as DD. Similarly, a heads up is important because for all species habitat degradation, transformation, and loss is a constant threat1.


See threatened reptiles ▼

¿What are threatened species?

9 % of reptiles in Colombia are threatened. Planning and conservation strategies, such as the risk extinction evaluation, are needed. Here the species information (distribution, demography, and population threats) is gathered and analyzed, in addition to the knowledge of researchers, to evaluate each species according to IUCN criteria. The results show what species should be the focus of research and management efforts (those that are threatened or are data deficient). Although various countries can share the distribution of a single species, each of them must develop their own evaluation since conservation status differ. In Colombia, evaluations are published in Red Books and are officially presented by updating the Endangered Species Act by the Ministry of Environment.

Changes in categories for turtles in relation to the previous evaluation are due to: increase in available information for the country, evaluation of all turtle species (in the 2002 analysis on 27 were evaluated), and a new interpretation of some criteria.

Turtles ▲ Snakes ▼

The number of threatened species increased from 22 to 50 when information about lizards and snakes (squamates) was included in the analysis. This group was initially not included due to lack of information.

Snakes ▲ Lizards ▼

There is evidence of population recovery only for two crocodile species in defined locations: American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) and Black Caiman (Melanosuchus niger).

Lizards ▲ Crocoodilians ▼

Results of the risk of extinction evaluation for reptiles

332
105
31
17
16
11
  • CR Critically Endangered
  • EN Endangered
  • VU Vulnerable
  • NT Near Theatened
  • LC Least Concern

DD Data Deficient


Number of threatened and non-threatened species by taxonomic group


Conservation strategies

To appease threats, different strategies have been developed. Conservation plans (at species or group scales) have been created, and the establishment of protected areas is also considered as a conservation effort, although these have not been reaching expected results. In addition to threats that are particular to each species, all reptiles, especially those distributed in the regions of the Caribbean and Magdalena, are threatened in great part due to habitat degradation, transformation, and loss. This shows that there is not a rigorous implementation of environmental norms inside of the territory, nor is there an integrated management of ecosystems.

Keywords

Threatened species Conservation
Red lists Management of knowledge