The red list index shows a greater extinction risk for species globally threatened in colombia and alerts about the need to work on achieving target 12 of the strategic plan of the convention on biological diversity in the coming four years.

Illustration
Variegated Spider Monkey


Threat category:

Open in SiB Colombia


The Red List Index of the IUCN measures the conservation status trend for a group of species. It is used as an indicator of international conservation goals and Sustainable Development Objectives (especifically Goal 12) from the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity.

Changes in Red List Index for some taxonomic groups

If all species of the group are under the category of Least Concern (LC) and thus it is not expected that any species becomes extinct in the near future, the Red List Index value equals to 1.0. A value of 0 in the Red List Index means that all evaluated species are extinct.

deco

A decreasing trend in the Index equals to an increasing expected extinction rate, caused by a greater number of species changing to a greater extinction risk category in comparison to those that transition into a lower risk category. This implies an increased loss of biodiversity for the group of species. A horizontal line represents a non-changing extinction rate. Lastly, an increasing trend signifies less expected extinct species in the near future, reducing the loss of biodiversity. It must be evaluated if transitions in extinction risk categories for a species are actually genuine. In other words, if the change in category is not due to real changes in the species or its habitat and instead responds to a greater amount of information and knowledge about the species, the change in category is not considered to be a genuine change and it must not be included in the calculation of the Index.

deco

The Red List of Threatened Species of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns a threat category to each species according to its risk of extinction. This category is selected based on standardized criteria that are evaluated for each species according to its characteristics of vulnerability and threat1.

Evaluations for risk extinction are developed in international processes in which experts assess the global threat for the species (global evaluations) and in national processes in which the risk for each species in each country is assessed (national evaluations). In Colombia, national evaluations are published in Red Books. Globally, evaluations are completed for each taxonomic group, preferably every four years, and an effort is made to evaluate all of the species in each group. In Colombia, national evaluations arise from a predetermined list of species and there is only one evaluation per taxonomic group. Only birds, fishes, and reptiles have been evaluated two times in the country.

The Red List Index2 is a complementary tool for evaluations of extinction risk since it summarizes the values of extinction risk for a group of species in a single value between 0 and 1, where 1 equals a better conservation status of the evaluated species. The Index is calculated once a new evaluation of extinction risk for a group of species is completed. With the Index, it may be determined if the condition of such group improved or declined in comparison to the previous evaluation. Additionally, the types of threats for different taxonomic groups may be compared.

For different taxonomic groups (amphibians, birds, invertebrates, mammals, fishes, plants, and reptiles) the Red List Index was compared by using the results of global evaluations for 6,165 species that are present in Colombia. For all taxonomic groups there was a decline in the Index, suggesting an escalation in the risk of extinction at a global level. This may be caused by increasing threats to species, lack of conservation measures that target threatened species, or a low effectiveness of implemented measures3.

Threatened species inhabiting the country seem to not be improving their global conservation status. In order to reduce extinction risks at a global scale, it is necessary to invest in conservation efforts in those countries with greatest biodiversity that also face significant threats of persistence. Colombia is one of the eight countries with greatest responsibility in the rise of extinction risks, particularly due to a decline in amphibian species 4.

An analysis of the Red List Index based on national evaluations may give evidence regarding the situation of species in Colombia and its possible similarities to global evaluations or advances in conservation statuses. However, calculating the Index at a national scale is not possible because there are no periodic evaluations for the same species or some previous evaluations were completed without complete information, rendering them invalid3. The great challenge is that of stimulating risk extinction evaluations in Colombia so there may be periodic results that allow for monitoring trends of extinction risks for different taxonomic groups in the country.


How can the completion of national evaluations be prioritized so that information to calculate Red List Indexes is available?

- Interview with María Cecilia Londoño -
(in spanish)

Number of species evaluated per taxonomic group and time periods

O Every 500 species

OVariation in the number of species per taxonomic group

Next ▶

Gráfica

How does high or low representativity of taxonomic groups in data affect the Red List Index?

- Interview with María Cecilia Londoño -
(in spanish)

◀ Previous

How is the Red List Index a valuable tool when assessing the conservation status of different species?

- Interview with María Cecilia Londoño -
(in spanish)

Number of species per taxonomic group included in the analysis

Keywords

Threatened species Conservation
Red lists Management of knowledge