Developing and implementing tools and strategies that ensure the comprehensive conservation of biodiversity is a priority in Colombian cities. In this way, biodiversity may be integrated in decision making processes that are related to the planning and environmental management of cities.


The Transversal Strategy for Green Growth established in the document Bases del Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2014-2018 (Bases for the National Plan of Development 2014-2018) identifies the inclusion of biodiversity and ecosystem services in urban planning as one of the necessary actions to ensure the sustainable use of natural resources in the country. Taking this into consideration, and motivated by the lack of knowledge and interest to support better decisions, the Humboldt Institute and the Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible (Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development)1 developed a conceptual framework for a plan of action. They identified three types of tools to facilitate the incorporation of biodiversity and ecosystem services criteria in urban planning and environmental management: 1. Management of knowledge, 2. Territorial management and 3. Social appropriation. It was a challenge for both entities to test such tools by technically accompanying and strengthening environmental authorities and metropolitan areas and municipalities, prioritizing the incorporation of the tools in the Planes de Ordenamiento Territorial (Land Use Planning Strategies--POT for its initials in Spanish) due to their impact on decisions related to the territory.

An essential goal that contributes to improving the quality of life in the cities is that of strengthening the technical and comprehension capacities regarding the importance of biodiversity inside urban areas of the involved actors, as well as those of the civil society. In this sense, the development of a conceptual framework produces a guide for the identification of goals and opportunities in biodiversity for urban planning and territorial management. The overarching aim includes facilitating the understanding of concepts and perspectives related to: 1. Meaning and significance of viewing urban areas as socio-ecological systems that function in regional contexts, 2. Forms in which urban biodiversity functions and expresses itself, 3. Roles of urban biodiversity in the offer of ecosystem services in cities and its relation to the wellbeing and quality of life of those people that live in the city, 4. Phenomena that currently challenge the survival of urban biodiversity and the opportunities that still exist for its persistence, 5. Concepts of integrated management for the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services in cities and its relation to urban land planning tools.

Challenges:

  • Success depends on the combined effort of territorial and environmental authorities in the management of information, land planning, and decision making directed towards an integrated management that ensures the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services in Colombian cities.
  • Recognizing the essential role of biodiversity and ecosystem services in the cities requires a short, medium, and long term management that includes monitoring indicators, budgets, and the improvement of technical and operative capacities of both territorial and environmental authorities.
  • It is an imperative to advance in the management of knowledge and information of urban areas so that updated data with good spatial and temporal resolutions is created. Also, the implementation of geographical information systems should be improved.
  • Biodiversity and ecosystem services in urban areas should play a major role in public agendas. Agreements between and within institutions should imply the planning and execution of the determined actions in the territorial management of a city or metropolitan area.
  • It is ideal to involve inhabitants in the process through citizen science in order to monitor the established tools before and after implementation. This contributes to governance through the comprehension of land planning and the construction of necessary information as a management tool for their own territory.

Growing urbanization in Colombia poses new challenges and opportunities for managing environmentally sustainable territories that reconcile development with human well-being.

General status of assessed cities:
Information about urban biodiversity and ecosystem services is incipient and needs reinforcement despite its importance in constructing a knowledge baseline about the territory, and hence in shaping decision making.
Creating cross-discipline thematic teams to strengthen technical capacities (both in populated centers and corporations) is key for managing, generating, and interpreting information layer.
Incentives based on the importance of the identification and preservation of urban biodiversity and ecosystem services must be created. They should also consider their technical and political avail in decision making or vinculations in land use planning.
Territorial functionality in relationships of cities with other urban centers or rural areas in planning and management is the most positive criterion of evaluation.
The commitment between entities is crucial so that they work together to reinforce environmental planning and management exercises to ensure continuity. Similarly, there must be links with academia, research centers, communities, and the general citizenship in order to create knowledge and social appropriation.

The role of biodiversity in this purpose is determinant due to the ecosystem services directly linked to the quality of life of all urban inhabitants.

Generalized tools to incorporate urban biodiversity and ecosystem services in planning instruments

Knowledge

Territorial management

Social appropriation

Select a Category to view related descriptions

Characterization of urban biodiversity and ecosystem services and management of information

Definition of analyses, diagnostics, objectives, outreach, criteria, and requirements when considering biodiversity and ecosystem services in planning

Establishment of priorities and optimization of implied actions when incorporating ecosystem services in urban planning

Some economic management instruments in the territory, such as compensations and incentives

Management actions that environmental authorities and territorial entities should develop so that biodiversity and its ecosystem services are effectively incorporated in urban planning

Interinstitutional alliances, technical assistance, concertation processes, monitoring and control strategies, etc.

Oriented to facilitate and support the participation of interested actors in the process of decision making and planning

First phases of planning in urban territory

Transversal in phases of local planning

Application is mostly evidenced in phases of formulation and management

Different phases of planning, execution, evaluation, and management

Special focus on last phases of process continuity with the community to ensure long term persistence

Biodiversity manuals and inventories

Mapping of biodiversity

Creation of indicators

Identification, spacialization, and analysis/valuation of ecosystem services and social benefits associated with urban biodiversity

Geographic information system

Cadastral survey of urban trees

Environmental determinants

Technical assistance from CAR to environmental entities

Definition of zones that are adequate for compensations for loss of biodiversity

Control of urbanization in areas of environmental importance

Creation of interinstitutional collaborations

Compensations

Compensation funds

Transference or sale of building and development permits

Conservation incentives

Exemptions

Funding Mechanisms

Environmental funds and financing

Corporate social responsibility

Alliances between public and private sectors

Strategies of social appropriation

Plans or projects of environmental education

Environmental classes

Difussion of information

Institutional

Environmental discussions

Urban environmental observatories

Collective

Collaborative mapping

Citizen collectives

Keywords

Urban management
Public policies Environmental norms
Conservation